Post by steve on Nov 13, 2007 7:12:48 GMT -5
Welcome to a special edition of Sean O'Mac's Pullin' No Punches (PnP for short). Every now and then, a topic of interest comes up that I'll be sure to shout out about. The usual edition of PnP appears each Wednesday on Wrestle Zone, and includes The Punching Bag with letters and opinions from readers. To give your own shout-out, send e-mails to wzseanomac@yahoo.com.
In the Nov. 7 edition of Pullin' No Punches, one of the topics I dove into was credible journalism. I stated that establishing credibility in the online world can be much more difficult than in the mainstream media.
However, if what I've seen recently is an example of mainstream media - I take it all back.
Recently, CNN aired a special entitled "Death Grip: Inside Pro Wrestling." If you caught the show, there actually were some decent parts to it. For instance, the WWE holding up CM Punk's "straight-edge" lifestyle was certainly applicable.
What I cannot stand as a journalist, especially one who does harp on credibility, is the spin that was given to John Cena's answer to the question, "Have you ever used steroids?"
When CNN aired his answer, even the narrator's intro of Cena made him appear guilty before the former WWE Champ even spoke. "He doesn't like being asked about steroids," the man said leading into Cena's response.
If you haven't watched it yet, either on CNN or WWE.com, here is the portion of Cena's response that aired:
This is a crazy question. And it's something that, um, it's tough to answer just because of the way society is now. The way people conceive things because performance-enhancing drugs have got the spotlight and it's a hot thing to talk about. I can't tell you that I haven't, but you'll never be able to prove that I have.
The way CNN aired this, it not only makes Cena look as though he's being evasive but also as though he's giving a vague admission of guilt. Listening to his entire response, however, paints a much different picture.
Here's a transcript of the much-more detailed exchange between CNN's reporter and Cena and you can immediately tell the difference in how his answer would be perceived by the general public.
CNN: I think WWE is under the microscope right now.
Cena: Of course, as is all of sports.
CNN: A lot of talk about steroid use.
Cena: Yeah.
CNN: Drug use. Have you ever used steroids?
Cena: Absolutely not. And this is a …
CNN: Even back in body building days? Football days?
Cena: This is a crazy question. And it's something that um, it's tough to answer just because of the way society is now. The way people conceive things because performance-enhancing drugs have got the spotlight and it's a hot thing to talk about.
Anytime you see any athlete in any athletic venture - could be the PGA Tour - achieve physical greatness, something that is beyond the norm even for a top-tier athlete … If top-tier athletes are rushing for 1,000 yards and somebody comes out and starts running people over and rushing for 2,000 - it's not athletic achievement any more and that's something that really gets me. It's "he or she is on performance-enhancing drugs."
And it's only because that certain athletes have gotten themselves into certain situations where automatically the finger is pointed at somebody. "Oh, they're on performance-enhancing drugs."
My answer to that question, "Have you ever used steroids?" is the only thing I can say. I can't tell you that I haven't but you'll never be able to prove that I have. Because each one of you, each one of you out there has an opinion on how I carry myself.
And I can take a million tests, I've been tested for drugs since I was 17 years old. I can take a million tests, I can pass every one of them. As soon as I pass it, there's some other guy on the other end going "Oh there's masking agents. There's this, there's that." I know the arguments because I've been in the situation.
This is a subject that's very very near and dear to me only because since I was a very small child I've worked my ass off to get to where I'm at. And it sucks to be able to have to deal with people saying that I rely on a crutch.
You know, I wake up every day and I work myself to the bone because I love what I do. I got the best gig in the world, I love it. And it kills me to have to sit here and do this with one arm. Like I wanna be back out there. You hear stories about guys coming home from the war, and they're in the infirmary, and all they want to do is get back in the field. I want to get back in the field. You know, it's killing me.
But to have to deal with the popularity of a substance that enhances performance, it's tough to take. I take great pride in the fact that I have a God-given gift of above-average natural strength. And I show it off whenever I can because to me that's fun, that's entertaining, it's what I love to do.
Now, I have a co-worker who has been big on wrestling most of his life, and can talk circles around me when it comes to historical matches and such. He's a very knowledgeable person whose opinion I respect - I even asked him to read my articles and give me his opinion on them.
But a brief discussion between he and I on this matter showed that depending on who you are, your opinion on this topic may vary greatly. You see, he's quite down on the wrestling biz lately and feels that the most important point to him was he absolutely does not believe Cena. He says there's no way wrestlers like him, HHH, even Vince McMahon have gotten as big as they are without juicing.
On that, I don't know that I disagree with him. Looking at things from as unbiased a view as I can, I don't know who has been "juicing" and who hasn't. I don't know who has just been blessed with superb genetics. I don't know John Cena, just his on-air persona. I can't tell you he's telling the truth - and I certainly can't accuse him of lying.
But to me, that's not the most-important issue here.
The issue is CNN taking a response from a Superstar and cutting it to fit their needs. Taking an answer that begins with "Absolutely not" and twisting it to make Cena look guilty is not journalism. It's sensationalism in the worst way and dishonest.
It was an act that made me ashamed to call myself a journalist.
I can, at least, feel content in the fact that there are responsible journalists out there - ones who report that facts as they find them without bias or agendas. I try very hard to count myself among them.
John Cena was a victim here, and his image has been tarnished in the public eye as a result. For that, Mr. Cena, I apologize on behalf of responsible journalists everywhere.
As for CNN - well, I already leaned toward a network that seems more "fair and balance" to me anyways, so don't count on seeing your channel on my box any more.
Sean "O'Mac" McGuinney's day job is as a newspaper editor. He has been a journalist for nearly 10 years and has covered everything from government to sports. The wrestling? Well, that's just been enjoyed since he was a kid. Don't ask how long ago that was.
For the very first time in my life, and definetly the only time, I am going to have to stand up for Cena... and this pains me deep inside...
Now, why am I doing this?
-Because if you haven't been keeping up, professional wrestling is something I live for. Without wrestling I would have no point in life. So here's MY spin on things...
1. Although I hate John Cena, it is still wrong to take someone's exact words and put them in a way that makes your station look good. CNN basically made Cena look worse than he already does. Seriously, if you are going to ask someone a serious question, you don't cut them off when they're answering it. When you switch up questions, that may be a good thing to do in getting the truth... But when you sit there and edit everything that a person said to make him end up saying something he didn't... That is not only wrong, but it is also against the Bill of Rights.
2. My personal beef on this comes from CNN targeting CM Punk, also making him look guilty.
CNN: "What does straight edge even mean?"
CM Punk: "Being straight edge means I don't do drugs, I don't take perfomance enhancers, and I do everything my way."
CNN: "Kind of funny that WWE made you world champion around the time of this, wouldn't you say?"
CM Punk: "Maybe so, but I still wear the title with honor."
Ok, basically what CNN is saying is that CM Punk is a fraud, and that he is only saying this stuff to get WWE out of trouble... I have a comment on that, which will sounds like a question...
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU STAND UP FOR WWE WHEN YOU'RE USING THE SAME GIMMICK YOU DID IN THE INDEPENDENT CIRCUIT?
Throughout his entire career, except through short Hardline turns, CM Punk has stuck to the Straightedge ways. In his ROH days he was straight edge... He might not have went into the deep details as he does in WWE, but that was his character... CNN can't go around and make people seem like frauds...
I have watched CM Punk for a while, and I loved him and Alex Shelley tagging as a team. I personally think CM Punk shouldn't even had been interviewed.
This issue means a lot to me because it makes my sport look bad because a few people took steroids... You see, it is possible to get the physical shape of a WWE superstar without drugs... People in the Military, who are serious about it no offense there X, work out nearly every day and a lot of them have that shape... My stepdad would make a dominant power house in WWE, and he has NEVER taken Steroids... There are people in my class who look like they'd make WWE superstars, and I know they don't take steroids because our school has a no enhancement policy... They do drug tests on athletes every month. How do I know? I had to do one for Wrestling and I'm gonna have to do another for Lacrosse.
This has gone too far, and if CNN continues to bash wrestling like they have, I personally am going to find a way to give back what they gave to us...
Now excuse me while I go kill myself for sticking up for John Cena...
In the Nov. 7 edition of Pullin' No Punches, one of the topics I dove into was credible journalism. I stated that establishing credibility in the online world can be much more difficult than in the mainstream media.
However, if what I've seen recently is an example of mainstream media - I take it all back.
Recently, CNN aired a special entitled "Death Grip: Inside Pro Wrestling." If you caught the show, there actually were some decent parts to it. For instance, the WWE holding up CM Punk's "straight-edge" lifestyle was certainly applicable.
What I cannot stand as a journalist, especially one who does harp on credibility, is the spin that was given to John Cena's answer to the question, "Have you ever used steroids?"
When CNN aired his answer, even the narrator's intro of Cena made him appear guilty before the former WWE Champ even spoke. "He doesn't like being asked about steroids," the man said leading into Cena's response.
If you haven't watched it yet, either on CNN or WWE.com, here is the portion of Cena's response that aired:
This is a crazy question. And it's something that, um, it's tough to answer just because of the way society is now. The way people conceive things because performance-enhancing drugs have got the spotlight and it's a hot thing to talk about. I can't tell you that I haven't, but you'll never be able to prove that I have.
The way CNN aired this, it not only makes Cena look as though he's being evasive but also as though he's giving a vague admission of guilt. Listening to his entire response, however, paints a much different picture.
Here's a transcript of the much-more detailed exchange between CNN's reporter and Cena and you can immediately tell the difference in how his answer would be perceived by the general public.
CNN: I think WWE is under the microscope right now.
Cena: Of course, as is all of sports.
CNN: A lot of talk about steroid use.
Cena: Yeah.
CNN: Drug use. Have you ever used steroids?
Cena: Absolutely not. And this is a …
CNN: Even back in body building days? Football days?
Cena: This is a crazy question. And it's something that um, it's tough to answer just because of the way society is now. The way people conceive things because performance-enhancing drugs have got the spotlight and it's a hot thing to talk about.
Anytime you see any athlete in any athletic venture - could be the PGA Tour - achieve physical greatness, something that is beyond the norm even for a top-tier athlete … If top-tier athletes are rushing for 1,000 yards and somebody comes out and starts running people over and rushing for 2,000 - it's not athletic achievement any more and that's something that really gets me. It's "he or she is on performance-enhancing drugs."
And it's only because that certain athletes have gotten themselves into certain situations where automatically the finger is pointed at somebody. "Oh, they're on performance-enhancing drugs."
My answer to that question, "Have you ever used steroids?" is the only thing I can say. I can't tell you that I haven't but you'll never be able to prove that I have. Because each one of you, each one of you out there has an opinion on how I carry myself.
And I can take a million tests, I've been tested for drugs since I was 17 years old. I can take a million tests, I can pass every one of them. As soon as I pass it, there's some other guy on the other end going "Oh there's masking agents. There's this, there's that." I know the arguments because I've been in the situation.
This is a subject that's very very near and dear to me only because since I was a very small child I've worked my ass off to get to where I'm at. And it sucks to be able to have to deal with people saying that I rely on a crutch.
You know, I wake up every day and I work myself to the bone because I love what I do. I got the best gig in the world, I love it. And it kills me to have to sit here and do this with one arm. Like I wanna be back out there. You hear stories about guys coming home from the war, and they're in the infirmary, and all they want to do is get back in the field. I want to get back in the field. You know, it's killing me.
But to have to deal with the popularity of a substance that enhances performance, it's tough to take. I take great pride in the fact that I have a God-given gift of above-average natural strength. And I show it off whenever I can because to me that's fun, that's entertaining, it's what I love to do.
Now, I have a co-worker who has been big on wrestling most of his life, and can talk circles around me when it comes to historical matches and such. He's a very knowledgeable person whose opinion I respect - I even asked him to read my articles and give me his opinion on them.
But a brief discussion between he and I on this matter showed that depending on who you are, your opinion on this topic may vary greatly. You see, he's quite down on the wrestling biz lately and feels that the most important point to him was he absolutely does not believe Cena. He says there's no way wrestlers like him, HHH, even Vince McMahon have gotten as big as they are without juicing.
On that, I don't know that I disagree with him. Looking at things from as unbiased a view as I can, I don't know who has been "juicing" and who hasn't. I don't know who has just been blessed with superb genetics. I don't know John Cena, just his on-air persona. I can't tell you he's telling the truth - and I certainly can't accuse him of lying.
But to me, that's not the most-important issue here.
The issue is CNN taking a response from a Superstar and cutting it to fit their needs. Taking an answer that begins with "Absolutely not" and twisting it to make Cena look guilty is not journalism. It's sensationalism in the worst way and dishonest.
It was an act that made me ashamed to call myself a journalist.
I can, at least, feel content in the fact that there are responsible journalists out there - ones who report that facts as they find them without bias or agendas. I try very hard to count myself among them.
John Cena was a victim here, and his image has been tarnished in the public eye as a result. For that, Mr. Cena, I apologize on behalf of responsible journalists everywhere.
As for CNN - well, I already leaned toward a network that seems more "fair and balance" to me anyways, so don't count on seeing your channel on my box any more.
Sean "O'Mac" McGuinney's day job is as a newspaper editor. He has been a journalist for nearly 10 years and has covered everything from government to sports. The wrestling? Well, that's just been enjoyed since he was a kid. Don't ask how long ago that was.
For the very first time in my life, and definetly the only time, I am going to have to stand up for Cena... and this pains me deep inside...
Now, why am I doing this?
-Because if you haven't been keeping up, professional wrestling is something I live for. Without wrestling I would have no point in life. So here's MY spin on things...
1. Although I hate John Cena, it is still wrong to take someone's exact words and put them in a way that makes your station look good. CNN basically made Cena look worse than he already does. Seriously, if you are going to ask someone a serious question, you don't cut them off when they're answering it. When you switch up questions, that may be a good thing to do in getting the truth... But when you sit there and edit everything that a person said to make him end up saying something he didn't... That is not only wrong, but it is also against the Bill of Rights.
2. My personal beef on this comes from CNN targeting CM Punk, also making him look guilty.
CNN: "What does straight edge even mean?"
CM Punk: "Being straight edge means I don't do drugs, I don't take perfomance enhancers, and I do everything my way."
CNN: "Kind of funny that WWE made you world champion around the time of this, wouldn't you say?"
CM Punk: "Maybe so, but I still wear the title with honor."
Ok, basically what CNN is saying is that CM Punk is a fraud, and that he is only saying this stuff to get WWE out of trouble... I have a comment on that, which will sounds like a question...
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU STAND UP FOR WWE WHEN YOU'RE USING THE SAME GIMMICK YOU DID IN THE INDEPENDENT CIRCUIT?
Throughout his entire career, except through short Hardline turns, CM Punk has stuck to the Straightedge ways. In his ROH days he was straight edge... He might not have went into the deep details as he does in WWE, but that was his character... CNN can't go around and make people seem like frauds...
I have watched CM Punk for a while, and I loved him and Alex Shelley tagging as a team. I personally think CM Punk shouldn't even had been interviewed.
This issue means a lot to me because it makes my sport look bad because a few people took steroids... You see, it is possible to get the physical shape of a WWE superstar without drugs... People in the Military, who are serious about it no offense there X, work out nearly every day and a lot of them have that shape... My stepdad would make a dominant power house in WWE, and he has NEVER taken Steroids... There are people in my class who look like they'd make WWE superstars, and I know they don't take steroids because our school has a no enhancement policy... They do drug tests on athletes every month. How do I know? I had to do one for Wrestling and I'm gonna have to do another for Lacrosse.
This has gone too far, and if CNN continues to bash wrestling like they have, I personally am going to find a way to give back what they gave to us...
Now excuse me while I go kill myself for sticking up for John Cena...
